Three quotations, three numbers, and a room full of people who each know somebody who "got it done for less."
The difficulty is not that committee members lack judgement. It is that the three papers in front of them are not comparable documents. One is two pages with a scope. One is a single line and a rate. One is somewhere in between. Comparing their totals is like comparing three cars by the size of the number plate.
There is a way to make them comparable, and it takes about twenty minutes.
Why a society decision is different
Which is why the goal is not the lowest number. It is a decision that is written down, comparable, and still explicable in three years.
Step 1 — Convert everything to per flat, per year
The single most useful thing a committee can do, and it needs no technical knowledge at all. Take each quotation and do two divisions.
That last figure is the one that belongs in the minutes.
| Quotation A | Quotation B | |
|---|---|---|
| Total quoted | ₹6,00,000 | ₹9,00,000 |
| Number of flats | 24 | 24 |
| Cost per flat | ₹25,000 | ₹37,500 |
| Written warranty | 5 years | 10 years |
| Cost per flat, per year | ₹5,000 | ₹3,750 |
Quotation A is a third cheaper and costs a quarter more per flat per year. In a meeting, that single line settles an argument that would otherwise run for an hour.
Two cautions on using it honestly. Use the written warranty period from the document — not a claimed service life, and not what somebody said on the phone. And check the warranty is of the same kind: most society terrace work is corrective rather than new construction, and corrective periods are usually shorter. A contractor offering the same period for both is either not pricing risk or not expecting to honour it.
Step 2 — Read the scope, not the rate
A cheaper quotation is rarely a cheaper version of the same job. It is usually a different job. Check each quotation for these eight items, and where it is silent write "not stated" rather than assuming.
| What to look for | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Area, with vertical surfaces measured separately | Parapets and upstands are where terraces leak. Leaving them out of the measurement makes any rate look better |
| The system, named | "Waterproofing" and "chemical coating" are not systems. A named product can be checked |
| Surface preparation | On a terrace treated before, the old failed layer may need removal. That is real work and real cost |
| Detailing, listed separately | Parapet junctions, drain mouths, pipe penetrations. Not priced separately usually means not priced at all |
| Coats and thickness | Should match the manufacturer's own datasheet |
| Testing | A flood test before the surface is closed. Ask what test, and what record you receive |
| The warranty | Period, what kind of work it applies to, and what limits it |
| Exclusions | What is not in the price — and who pays if it becomes necessary |
Make this a table on one sheet with three columns, one per quotation. The column with the most blanks is not the cheapest offer. It is the least defined one.